Talking with Clay
A Washington Post
description of an exhibit at the
University of Pennsylvania’s Institute of Contemporary Art, noted that more and
more people are taking up knitting and pot-throwing. The article attributed to Nicholas
Bell, a curator at the Renwick Gallery, the notion that this as a “reaction
against the time we now spend working with ephemeral digital signals, rather
than a sign of new things we’ve found to say with the hand-wrought.” Knitting a
sweater might serve as an antidote to staring at a computer screen all day, but
according to Bell, chances are that the sweater will look “an awful lot like
another 100,000 sweaters that will have been made.”
This got me thinking about why it is that I make pots that
look “an awful lot like another 100,000 pots that have been made.” In the past,
I have agreed with Bell and held that my reason for making pots is to achieve a connection with others that I find lacking in today's impersonal world. And, indeed, it is a special treat to see people ponder and handle different pieces until they settle on the one that calls their name. There are more personal connections, too, like the 15 commemorative pitchers that I made for a group of Army spouses whose husbands were being transferred. They wanted to have something that they would use regularly to remind them of each other and their time together. Or the cereal bowl I
made for my husband, inscribed with a couple of lines from one of the poems he
wrote as a young man.
However, while connections (as well as the ego boost of
people liking my pottery enough to spend their hard-earned money on it) are
nice, the fact is that I am mostly an introvert, not someone that would be described
as “craving to establish connections.” I am glad that my pieces find a buying
public because otherwise I would be drowning in pots (my family and friends,
long ago having decided that I’ve gifted them enough pottery, are wondering
when I am going to actually buy them birthday presents!).
So, why do I continue making pots that look like 100,000
other pots? And, what is it that I have to “say”?
I think that it’s the process of making that I crave and
that this is something intrinsic not just to humans but to all kinds of other
animals. There is the bower bird who adorns its nest with bits of foil and
other such “jewels,” for example. And I once read about a study of chimpanzees
who were given clay and other materials such as feathers, beads and paint. The
chimpanzees spontaneously made “art.” That is, they shaped the clay and
decorated it for no purpose other than the “doing,” the joy of making. But if
it’s about the making for me, why pottery? Why not something else?
I like the solitude, the aloneness in the studio, just me
and my thoughts. Time standing stills; time rushing backwards to the land of
memories and rushing forward to the land of hopes and dreams. It is the soothing
meditation of the wheel going around. It is the growing and shaping of the clay
between my hands, sometimes seemingly all by itself, other times requiring all
my strength and concentration to get the lump of clay to take shape. It’s the
physical aspect of it, the prodding and cajoling. It’s the learning anew how to
make a pot every time I sit at the wheel. It’s the experimenting with new
ideas. The continuous and inescapable changes of the clay from mud to stone:
the malleability, the fragility and the hardiness of the pieces as they go
through the cycle of lump of clay, bone-dry greenware and fired stoneware pot. Each
pot is a bit like my own life, a lump of clay molded by people and events; a
fragile, too tender being at times on the brink of shattering into dust, and the
stone-hard woman who continues to endure despite all the cracks.
No, I don’t think of myself as a ceramist (artist), but
rather a potter (craftsperson), enthralled by the muddy, mucky task of living. And,
what is it that I have to say with my pots? Simply, I am!
Visit my blog at: www.glyntpottery.blogspot.com